Humm,,, a fellow twitter friend ask me which renderer I use and which one I prefer? Personally I use mental ray and the default scanline renderer in max. I think both could give good result. Take a look at these two image. The first is a mental ray generated image and the second a render done with the default scanline renderer.




Both images are interesting. Some may prefer the mental ray one and other the scanline. Personally I prefer the mental ray one. I think it kinda give that clean and photo realistic look to the picture. I remember when Ive finish this picture people at work prefer the right one (the scanline one) They said the image as more personality to it. I think you can achieve great result in scanline, you can even fake global illumination but it is more difficult to get that pelicular effect as in mental ray. You really got to work the light and the shadows to do it. Here is a picture that I'm proud of entirely done in scanline. 

But enough talking about my work. Is v-ray good? Of what I heard it is more easier to get a photo realistic image with v-ray. Some even say it work better and that it is more easy to set a good render than with mental ray. I may not tell it myself but it is the subject to this post. I want to know which renderer you use and why. I'm planning to use v-ray as it have a really good reputation but doesn't it worth the purchase or may I continue with mental ray?
here is a link to a forum on it but I want to hear from you here to get some action! :
http://www.cgarchitect.com/vb/8300-mental-ray-vs-vray.html
a link where you can download a demo version v-ray:
http://www.digimation.com/home/Downloads.aspx?sm=vr
Sam The 3d Blogger
www.the3dblogger.blogspot.com
http://www.cgarchitect.com/vb/8300-mental-ray-vs-vray.html
a link where you can download a demo version v-ray:
http://www.digimation.com/home/Downloads.aspx?sm=vr
Sam The 3d Blogger
www.the3dblogger.blogspot.com